English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Voting in multi-issue domains allows for compromise outcomes that satisfy allvoters to some extent. Such fairness considerations, however, open thepossibility of a special form of manipulation: free-riding. By untruthfullyopposing a popular opinion in one issue, voters can receive increasedconsideration in other issues. We study under which conditions this ispossible. Additionally, we study free-riding from a computational andexperimental point of view. Our results show that free-riding in multi-issuedomains is largely unavoidable, but comes at a non-negligible individual riskfor voters. Thus, the allure of free-riding is smaller than one couldintuitively assume.

Free-Riding in Multi-Issue Decisions