English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

External shocks embody an unexpected and disruptive impact on the regularlife of people. This was the case during the COVID-19 outbreak that rapidly ledto changes in the typical mobility patterns in urban areas. In response, peoplereorganised their daily errands throughout space. However, these changes mightnot have been the same across socioeconomic classes leading to possibileadditional detrimental effects on inequality due to the pandemic. In this paperwe study the reorganisation of mobility segregation networks due to externalshocks and show that the diversity of visited places in terms of locations andsocioeconomic status is affected by the enforcement of mobility restrictionduring pandemic. We use the case of COVID-19 as a natural experiment in severalcities to observe not only the effect of external shocks but also its mid-termconsequences and residual effects. We build on anonymised and privacy-preservedmobility data in four cities: Bogota, Jakarta, London, and New York. We couplemobility data with socioeconomic information to capture inequalities inmobility among different socioeconomic groups and see how it changesdynamically before, during, and after different lockdown periods. We find thatthe first lockdowns induced considerable increases in mobility segregation ineach city, while loosening mobility restrictions did not necessarily diminishedisolation between different socioeconomic groups, as mobility mixing has notrecovered fully to its pre-pandemic level even weeks after the interruption ofinterventions. Our results suggest that a one fits-all policy does not equallyaffect the way people adjust their mobility, which calls for socioeconomicallyinformed intervention policies in the future.

Mobility Segregation Dynamics and Residual Isolation During Pandemic Interventions