English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper study author simultaneously engaged in multiple affiliations basedon bibliometric data covered in the Web of Science for the 2017-2021 period.Based on the affiliation information in publication records, we propose ageneral classification for multiple affiliations within-country orcross-country for analyzing authors' behavior in multiple affiliations andpreferences of host countries across research fields. We find a decrease inpublications led by international multi-affiliated authorship after 2020, andChina has shown a falling trend after 2018. More G7 countries are active infields like Social Sciences, Clinical and Life Sciences. China, India, andRussia are active in physical sciences-related fields. Countries prefer toaffiliate with G7 countries, especially in Clinical and Life Sciences. Thesefindings may provide more insights into the understanding of the behavior andproductivity of multi-affiliated researchers in the current academic landscape.

Multi-Affiliated Authors Behave Differently across Fields and Host Country Preferences: A Comparison in G7 and BRICS