English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Gender inequalities in science have long been observed globally. Studies havedemonstrated it through survey data or published literature, focusing on theinterests of subjects or authors; few, however, examined the manifestation ofgender inequalities on researchers' knowledge status. This study analyzes therelationship between regional and gender identities, topics, and knowledgestatus while revealing the female labor division in science and scientificresearch using online Q&A from researchers. We find that gender inequalitiesare merged with both regional-specific characteristics and global commonpatterns. Women's field and topic distribution within fields are influenced byregions, yet the prevalent topics are consistent in all regions. Women are moreinvolved in specific topics, particularly topics about experiments with weakerlevels of knowledge and they are of less assistance. To promote inequality inscience, the scientific community should pay more attention to reducing theknowledge gap and encourage women to work on unexplored topics and areas.

Gender Inequalities: Women Researchers Require More Knowledge in Specific and Experimental Topics