English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Popular test oracles for the perception subsystem of driving automationsystems identify true-positive (TP), false-positive (FP), and false-negative(FN) objects. Oracle transparency is needed for comparing test results and forsafety cases. To date, there exists a common notion of TPs, FPs, and FNs in thefield, but apparently no published way to comprehensively define their oracles.Therefore, this paper provides a checklist of functional aspects andimplementation details that affect the oracle behavior. Besides labelingpolicies of the test set, we cover fields of view, occlusion handling,safety-relevant areas, matching criteria, temporal and probabilistic issues,and further aspects. Even though our checklist can hardly be formalized, it canhelp practitioners maximize the transparency of their oracles, which, in turn,makes statements on object perception more reliable and comparable.

Checklist to Transparently Define Test Oracles for TP, FP, and FN Objects in Automated Driving