English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Argument graphs provide an abstract representation of an argumentativesituation. A bipolar argument graph is a directed graph where each node denotesan argument, and each arc denotes the influence of one argument on another.Here we assume that the influence is supporting, attacking, or ambiguous. In abipolar argument graph, each argument is atomic and so it has no internalstructure. Yet to better understand the nature of the individual arguments, andhow they interact, it is important to consider their internal structure. Toaddress this need, this paper presents a framework based on the use of logicalarguments to instantiate bipolar argument graphs, and a set of possibleconstraints on instantiating arguments that take into account the internalstructure of the arguments, and the types of relationship between arguments.

Some Options for Instantiation of Bipolar Argument Graphs with Deductive Arguments