English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this position paper, we advocate for the idea that courses and exams inthe AI era have to be designed based on two factors: (1) the strengths andlimitations of AI, and (2) the pedagogical educational objectives. Based oninsights from the Delors report on education [1], we first address the role ofeducation and recall the main objectives that educational institutes muststrive to achieve independently of any technology. We then explore thestrengths and limitations of AI, based on current advances in AI. We explainhow courses and exams can be designed based on these strengths and limitationsof AI, providing different examples in the IT, English, and Art domains. Weshow how we adopted a pedagogical approach that is inspired from the Socraticteaching method from January 2023 to May 2023. Then, we present the dataanalysis results of seven ChatGPT-authorized exams conducted between December2022 and March 2023. Our exam data results show that there is no correlationbetween students' grades and whether or not they use ChatGPT to answer theirexam questions. Finally, we present a new exam system that allows us to applyour pedagogical approach in the AI era.

How to Design and Deliver Courses for Higher Education in the AI Era: Insights from Exam Data Analysis