English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Indian Judiciary is suffering from burden of millions of cases that are lyingpending in its courts at all the levels. In this paper, we analyze the datathat we have collected on the pendency of 24 high courts in the Republic ofIndia as they were made available on High Court NJDG (HC-NJDG). We collecteddata on 73 days beginning August 31, 2017 to December 26, 2018, including thesedays. Thus, the data collected by us spans a period of almost sixteen months.We have analyzed various statistics available on the NJDG portal for HighCourts, including but not limited to the number of judges in each high court,the number of cases pending in each high court, cases that have been pendingfor more than 10 years, cases filed, listed and disposed, cases filed by womenand senior citizens, etc. Our results show that: 1) statistics as important asthe number of judges in high courts have serious errors on NJDG (Fig. 1, 2, 10,11, Table V). 2) pending cases in most of the high courts are increasing ratherthan decreasing (Fig. 3, 13). 3) regular update of HC-NJDG is required for itto be useful. Data related to some high courts is not being updated regularlyor is updated erroneously on the portal (Fig. 14). 4) there is a hugedifference in terms of average load of cases on judges of different high courts(Fig. 6). 5) if all the high courts operate at their approved strength ofjudges, then for most of the high courts pendency can be nullified within 20years from now (Fig. 21, 22). 6) the pending cases filed by women and seniorcitizens are disproportionately low, they together constitute less than 10% ofthe total pending cases (Fig. 23 - 27) 7) a better scheduling process forpreparing causelists in courts can help reducing the number of pending cases inthe High Courts (Fig. 29). 8) some statistics are not well defined (Fig. 31).

Analyzing HC-NJDG Data to Understand the Pendency in High Courts in India