English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Indifference of a player with respect to two distinct outcomes of a gamecannot be handled by small perturbations, because the actual choice may havesignificant impact on other players, and cause them to act in a way that hassignificant impact of the indifferent player. It is argued that ties amongrational choices can be resolved by refinements of the concept of rationalitybased on the utilities of other players. One such refinement is the concept ofTit-for-Tat.

On "Indifference" and Backward Induction in Games with Perfect Information