English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Contemporary content-focused research-based assessment instruments typicallyuse instrument items (i.e., questions) as the unit of assessment for instrumentscoring, reporting, and validation. However, traditional item-based scoring hasa number of limitations, including several arising from the use of the commonassessment development conventions of single-construct items,unidimensionality, and single-correct-answer items. Couplet scoring, introducedin this paper, employs the couplet as an alternative unit of assessment, wherea couplet is essentially an item viewed and scored through the lens of aspecific assessment objective (AO). With couplet scoring, a single item mayhave more than one AO and therefore more than one couplet. In this paper, weoutline the limitations of traditional item scoring, introduce couplet scoringand discuss its affordances (especially as they relate to limitations of itemscoring), and use a recently developed content RBAI to ground our discussion.

Couplet scoring for research based assessment instruments