English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Due to the high demand for mobile applications, given the exponential growthof users of this type of technology, testing professionals are frequentlyrequired to invest time in studying testing tools, in particular, becausenowadays, several different tools are available. A variety of tools makes itdifficult for testing professionals to choose the one that best fits theirgoals and supports them in their work. In this sense, we conducted acomparative analysis among five open-source tools for mobile testing: Appium,Robotium, Espresso, Frank, and EarGrey. We used the documentary analysis methodto explore the official documentation of each above-cited tool and developedvarious comparisons based on technical criteria reported in the literatureabout characteristics that mobile testing tools should have. Our findings areexpected to help practitioners understand several aspects of mobile testingtools.

Comparing Mobile Testing Tools Using Documentary Analysis