English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Thompson reports a comparison of data from STRmix and TrueAllele. The data hehas arises from different inputs to the two software. If the input data aremade more similar the outputs become more similar. Thompson argues that theAnalytical Threshold, AT, should be varied in casework. This produced differentLRs but the analyst would be left deciding what to do with these options. Thiscannot be based on the LRs but should be based on whether any movement in theAT adds reliable or unreliable data. This is how most laboratories set their ATin the first place. Hence it is pointless, and potentially dangerous, toexperimentally vary the AT in casework. The profile is low level and shows atmost three peaks. Thompson argues that LR results assuming that the number ofcontributors (NoC) is 2 or 3 should be reported. Uncertainty in NoC should betreated as a nuisance variable and summed out.

Comments arising from WJ Thompson "Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA A case study comparing STRmix and TrueAllele"