English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article reviews recent advances in addressing empirical identificationissues in cross-country and country-level studies and their implications forthe identification of the effectiveness and consequences of economic sanctions.I argue that, given the difficulties in assessing causal relationships incross-national data, country-level case studies can serve as a useful andinformative complement to cross-national regression studies. However, I alsowarn that case studies pose a set of additional potential empirical pitfallswhich can obfuscate rather than clarify the identification of causal mechanismsat work. Therefore, the most sensible way to read case study evidence is as acomplement rather than as a substitute to cross-national research.

Estimating causal effects of sanctions impacts: what role for country-level studies?