English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Synchronization is an ubiquitous phenomenon in dynamical systems of networkedoscillators. While it is often a goal to achieve, in some context one wouldlike to decrease it, e.g., although synchronization is essential to the goodfunctioning of brain dynamics, hyper-synchronization can induce problems likeepilepsy seizures. Motivated by this problem, scholars have developed pinningcontrol schemes able to decrease synchronization in a system. Focusing on oneof these methods, the goal of the present work is to analyse which is the bestway to select the controlled nodes, i.e. the one that guarantees the lowersynchronization rate. We show that hubs are generally the most advantageousnodes to control, especially when the degree distribution is heterogeneous.Nevertheless, pinning a too large number of hubs is in general not anappropriate choice. Our results are in line with previous works that studiedpinning control aimed to increase synchronization. These observations shedlight on an interesting universality of good practice of node selectiondisregarding the actual goal of the control scheme.

On the location and the strength of controllers to desynchronize coupled Kuramoto oscillators