English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We study the $f(Q, T)$ gravity in the framework of Weyl geometry (known asWeyl-type $f(Q, T)$ gravity), where $Q$ denotes the non-metricity scalar, and$T$ denotes the energy-momentum tensor trace. In this work, we consider the$f(Q,T)$ model, which is defined as $f(Q,T)=\alphaQ^{m+1}+\frac{\beta}{6\kappa^2}T$ and investigating two scenarios: $(I)$ $m=0$(linear model) and $(II)$ $m\neq 0$ (nonlinear model). For both scenarios, wefind the explicit solution for the field equations by using the barotropicequation of state as $p=\omega\rho$, where $\omega$ is the equation-of-state(EoS) parameter. Further, we study the obtained solutions statistically usingthe $Pantheon^+$ dataset with 1701 data points. For both models, the best-fitvalues of model parameters for $1-\sigma$ and $2-\sigma$ confidence level arementioned in table 1 and 2. We statistically compare our models to the$\Lambda$CDM model using ${{\chi}^2_{min}}$, ${{\chi}^2_{red}}$, $AIC$ and$\Delta AIC$. We also examined the current values of cosmological parameterssuch as deceleration and EoS parameters to determine the current accelerationexpansion of the universe. Furthermore, we test our model using $Om$ diagnosticand compare it to the $\Lambda$CDM model to determine its dark energy profile.Finally, we draw the conclusion that, statistically speaking, Weyl $f(Q,T)$model I (linear model) is more compatible with the $\Lambda$CDM model than Weyl$f(Q,T)$ model II (nonlinear model).

Statistical and Observation Comparison of Weyl-Type $f(Q,T)$ Models with the $\Lambda$CDM Paradigm