English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Automated fact-checking is often presented as an epistemic tool thatfact-checkers, social media consumers, and other stakeholders can use to fightmisinformation. Nevertheless, few papers thoroughly discuss how. We documentthis by analysing 100 highly-cited papers, and annotating epistemic elementsrelated to intended use, i.e., means, ends, and stakeholders. We find thatnarratives leaving out some of these aspects are common, that many paperspropose inconsistent means and ends, and that the feasibility of suggestedstrategies rarely has empirical backing. We argue that this vagueness activelyhinders the technology from reaching its goals, as it encourages overclaiming,limits criticism, and prevents stakeholder feedback. Accordingly, we provideseveral recommendations for thinking and writing about the use of fact-checkingartefacts.

The Intended Uses of Automated Fact-Checking Artefacts: Why, How and Who