English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This study details the development and validation of a new algorithm thatdetermines the dominant habit plane of a transformed child phase fromorientation maps of a single planar cross-section. The method describes thehabit plane in terms of its five-parameter grain boundary character and couplesit to the specific orientation relationship of the identified orientationvariant. The symmetry operations associated with the specific orientationrelationship of the variants are applied to transform habit plane traces asdetermined in the specimen-fixed reference frame into the parent or childreference frame, allowing for the fitting of the habit plane. Our algorithmstands out by its robustness, computational efficiency, automation and abilityto operate on fully transformed microstructures. Four automated methods forhabit plane trace determination are proposed and compared. Detailed sensitivityanalysis reveals that the proposed algorithm is exceptionally robust againstpoor accuracy in the measured traces and distortions in the orientation map,but more sensitive to inaccuracies propagated from parent grain reconstruction.Validation on a synthetic microstructure with a known habit plane and returnedconsistent results when applied to high and low carbon steels with differentprior austenite grain sizes and orientation map resolutions. The habit planeswere not significantly affected by the austenite grain sizes. The habit planeof the steel with 0.35 wt.% C was close to (111){\gamma} whereas the habitplane of steel with 0.71 wt.% C was closer to (575){\gamma}, in close agreementwith previous work using two-surface stereological analysis and transmissionelectron microscopy-based trace analysis.

Habit plane determination from reconstructed parent phase orientation maps