English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The Japanese CCGBank serves as training and evaluation data for developingJapanese CCG parsers. However, since it is automatically generated from theKyoto Corpus, a dependency treebank, its linguistic validity still needs to besufficiently verified. In this paper, we focus on the analysis ofpassive/causative constructions in the Japanese CCGBank and show that, togetherwith the compositional semantics of ccg2lambda, a semantic parsing system, ityields empirically wrong predictions for the nested construction of passivesand causatives.

Is Japanese CCGBank empirically correct? A case study of passive and causative constructions