English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

It has very recently been claimed that the neutrino-assisted early darkenergy model -- a promising resolution of the Hubble tension that canameliorate the theoretical fine-tuning and coincidence problems that plagueother theories -- does not provide natural or cosmologically interestingresults. In this short paper, we show that these conclusions are incorrect forthree reasons. First, we identify errors in the calculations. Second, wedispute the definition in of what constitutes an 'interesting' and 'natural'model. Finally, we demonstrate that the conclusions of were arrived at withoutfully exploring the full parameter space of the model. Neutrino-assisted earlydark energy remains a natural and interesting potential resolution of theHubble tension that merits further study.

Neutrino-Assisted Early Dark Energy is a Natural Resolution of the Hubble Tension