English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Like Asynchrony, Mobility of faults precludes consensus. Yet, a model M inwhich Consensus is solvable, has an analogue relaxed model in which Consensusis not solvable and for which we can ask, whether Consensus is solvable if thesystem initially behaves like the relaxed analogue model, but eventually morphsinto M. We consider two relaxed analogues of M. The first is the traditionalAsynchronous model, and the second to be defined, the Mobile analogue. Whilefor some M we show that Consensus is not solvable in the Asynchronous analogue,it is solvable in all the Mobile analogues. Hence, from this perspectiveMobility is superior to Asynchrony.  The pie in the sky relationship we envision is: Consensus is solvable in M,if and only if binary Commit-Adopt is solvable in the mobile analogue.  The ``only if'' is easy. Here we show case by case that the ``if'' holds forall the common faults types.

Synchrony/Asynchrony vs. Stationary/Mobile? The Latter is Superior...in Theory