English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A recent perspective paper by Kazanina & Tavano (referred to as the KTperspective in the following) argues how neural oscillations cannot provide apotential neural correlate for syntactic structure building. The view thatneural oscillations can provide a potential neural correlate for syntacticstructure building is largely attributed to a study by Ding, Melloni, Zhang,Tian, and Poeppel in 2016 (referred to as the DMZTP study).  The KT perspective is thought provoking, but has severe misinterpretationsabout the arguments in DMZTP and other studies, and contains contradictoryconclusions in different parts of the perspective, making it impossible tounderstand the position of the authors. In the following, I summarize a fewmisinterpretations and inconsistent arguments in the KT perspective, and putforward a few suggestions for future studies.

The Neural Correlates of Linguistic Structure Building: Comments on Kazanina & Tavano (2022)