English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Let $\Omega$ be a bounded Lipshcitz domain in $\mathbb{R}^n$ and we studyboundary behaviors of solutions to the Laplacian eigenvalue equation withconstant Neumann data. \begin{align}  \label{cequation0} \begin{cases} -\Delta u=cu\quad &\mbox{in $\Omega$}\\\frac{\partial u}{\partial \nu}=-1\quad &\mbox{on $\partial \Omega$}.\end{cases} \end{align}First, by using properties of Bessel functions andproving new inequalities on elementary symmetric polynomials, we obtain thefollowing inequality for rectangular boxes, balls and equilateral triangles:\begin{align} \label{bbb}  \lim_{c\rightarrow \mu_2^-}c\int_{\partial \Omega}u_c\, d\sigma\ge\frac{n-1}{n}\frac{P^2(\Omega)}{|\Omega|}, \end{align}with equality achievedonly at cubes and balls. In the above, $u_c$ is the solution to the eigenvalueequation and $\mu_2$ is the second Neumann Laplacian eigenvalue. Second, let$\kappa_1$ be the best constant for the Poincar\'e inequality with mean zero on$\partial \Omega$, and we prove that $\kappa_1\le \mu_2$, with equality holdsif and only if $\int_{\partial \Omega}u_c\, d\sigma>0$ for any $c\in(0,\mu_2)$. As a consequence, $\kappa_1=\mu_2$ on balls, rectangular boxes andequilateral triangles, and balls maximize $\kappa_1$ over all Lipschitz domainswith fixed volume. As an application, we extend the symmetry breaking resultsfrom ball domains obtained in Bucur-Buttazzo-Nitsch[J. Math. Pures Appl.,2017], to wider class of domains, and give quantitative estimates for theprecise breaking threshold at balls and rectangular boxes. It is a directconsequence that for domains with $\kappa_1<\mu_2$, the above boundary limitinequality is never true, while whether it is valid for domains on which$\kappa_1=\mu_2$ remains open.

On Laplacian eigenvalue equation with constant Neumann boundary data