English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

We describe a model that explains possibly indecisive choice behavior, thatis, quasi-choices (choice correspondences that may be empty on some menus). Thejustification is here provided by a proportion of ballots, which arequasi-choices rationalizable by an arbitrary binary relation. We call aquasi-choice $s$-majoritarian if all options selected from a menu are endorsedby a share of ballots larger than $s$. We prove that all forms ofmajoritarianism are equivalent to a well-known behavioral property, namelyChernoff axiom. Then we focus on two paradigms of majoritarianism, wherebyeither a simple majority of ballots justifies a quasi-choice, or theendorsement by a single ballot suffices - a liberal justification. Thesebenchmark explanations typically require a different minimum number of ballots.We determine the asymptotic minimum size of a liberal justification.

Rationalization of indecisive choice behavior by majoritarian ballots