English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Static bug detection tools help developers detect problems in the code,including bad programming practices and potential defects. Recent efforts tointegrate static bug detectors in modern software development workflows, suchas in code review and continuous integration, are shown to better motivatedevelopers to fix the reported warnings on the fly. A proper mechanism to trackthe evolution of the reported warnings can better support such integration.Moreover, tracking the static code warnings will benefit many downstreamsoftware engineering tasks, such as learning the fix patterns for automatedprogram repair, and learning which warnings are of more interest, so they canbe prioritized automatically. In addition, the utilization of tracking toolsenables developers to concentrate on the most recent and actionable staticwarnings rather than being overwhelmed by the thousands of warnings from theentire project. This, in turn, enhances the utilization of static analysistools. Hence, precisely tracking the warnings by static bug detectors iscritical to improving the utilization of static bug detectors further.

Tracking the Evolution of Static Code Warnings: the State-of-the-Art and a Better Approach