English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The paper investigates the relative expressiveness of two logic-basedlanguages for reasoning over streams, namely LARS Programs -- the language ofthe Logic-based framework for Analytic Reasoning over Streams called LARS --and LDSR -- the language of the recent extension of the I-DLV system for streamreasoning called I-DLV-sr. Although these two languages build over Datalog,they do differ both in syntax and semantics. To reconcile their expressivecapabilities for stream reasoning, we define a comparison framework that allowsus to show that, without any restrictions, the two languages are incomparableand to identify fragments of each language that can be expressed via the otherone.

A Formal Comparison between Datalog-based Languages for Stream Reasoning (extended version)