English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Our article [arXiv:2111.13727(2021)] argues that the phenomenology ofinterference that is traditionally regarded as problematic does not, in fact,capture the essence of quantum theory -- contrary to the claims of Feynman andmany others. It does so by demonstrating the existence of a physical theory,which we term the "toy field theory", that reproduces this phenomenology butwhich does not sacrifice the classical worldview. In their Comment[arXiv:2204.01768(2022)], Hance and Hossenfelder dispute our claim. Correctingmistaken claims found therein and responding to their criticisms provides uswith an opportunity to further clarify some of the ideas in our article.

Reply to "Comment on 'Why interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory' "