English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Test smells can reduce the developers' ability to interact with the testcode. Refactoring test code offers a safe strategy to handle test smells.However, the manual refactoring activity is not a trivial process, and it isoften tedious and error-prone. This study aims to evaluate RAIDE, a tool forautomatic identification and refactoring of test smells. We present anempirical assessment of RAIDE, in which we analyzed its capability atrefactoring Assertion Roulette and Duplicate Assert test smells and comparedthe results against both manual refactoring and a state-of-the-art approach.The results show that RAIDE provides a faster and more intuitive approach forhandling test smells than using an automated tool for smells detection combinedwith manual refactoring.

Refactoring Assertion Roulette and Duplicate Assert test smells: a controlled experiment