English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Researchers have derived many theoretical models for specifying users'insights as they interact with a visualization system. These representationsare essential for understanding the insight discovery process, such as wheninferring user interaction patterns that lead to insight or assessing the rigorof reported insights. However, theoretical models can be difficult to apply toexisting tools and user studies, often due to discrepancies in how insight andits constituent parts are defined. This paper calls attention to the consistentstructures that recur across the visualization literature and describes howthey connect multiple theoretical representations of insight. We synthesize aunified formalism for insights using these structures, enabling a wideraudience of researchers and developers to adopt the corresponding models.Through a series of theoretical case studies, we use our formalism to compareand contrast existing theories, revealing interesting research challenges inreasoning about a user's domain knowledge and leveraging synergistic approachesin data mining and data management research.

What Do We Mean When We Say "Insight"? A Formal Synthesis of Existing Theory