English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Comparisons of the coverage of current and proposed dark matter searches canhelp us to understand the context in which a discovery of particle dark matterwould be made. In some scenarios, a discovery could be reinforced byinformation from multiple, complementary types of experiments; in others, onlyone experiment would see a signal, giving only a partial, more ambiguouspicture; in still others, no experiment would be sensitive and new approacheswould be needed. In this whitepaper, we present an update to a similar studyperformed for the European Strategy Briefing Book performed within the darkmatter at the Energy Frontier (EF10) Snowmass Topical Group We take as astarting point a set of projections for future collider facilities and a methodof graphical comparisons routinely performed for LHC DM searches usingsimplified models recommended by the LHC Dark Matter Working Group and alsoused for the BSM and dark matter chapters of the European Strategy BriefingBook. These comparisons can also serve as launching point for cross-frontierdiscussions about dark matter complementarity.

Summarizing experimental sensitivities of collider experiments to dark matter models and comparison to other experiments