English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The approach to heteroscedasticity of ref.1(Instruments 2022, 6(1), 10)contains a sketchy application of a sub-optimal method of very easyimplementation: the lucky model. The supporting proof of this method could notbe inserted in ref.1. The proof requires the analytical forms of theprobability of ref.2 for the two strip center of gravity. However, thoseanalytical forms suggest also a completion of the lucky-model for the absenceof a scaling constant, relevant for combinations of different detector types.The advanced lucky-model (the super-lucky model) can be directly used for trackfitting in trackers composed of non-identical detectors. The construction ofthe weights for the fits is very simple. Simulations of track fitting with thisupgraded tool show resolution improvements also for combination of two types ofvery different detectors, near to the resolutions of the schematic model ofref.1.

Sub-optimal Approaches to Heteroscedasticity in Silicon Strip Detectors: the Lucky Model and the Super-Lucky Model