English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

What kinds of arguments do people make, and what effect do they have onothers? Normative constraints on argument-making are as old as philosophyitself, but little is known about the diversity of arguments made in practice.We use NLP tools to extract patterns of argument-making from the Reddit site"Change My View" (r/CMV). This reveals six distinct argument patterns: not justthe familiar deductive and inductive forms, but also arguments aboutdefinitions, relevance, possibility and cause, and personal experience. Datafrom r/CMV also reveal differences in efficacy: personal experience and, to alesser extent, arguments about causation and examples, are most likely to shifta person's view, while arguments about relevance are the least. Finally, ourmethods reveal a gradient of argument-making preferences among users: atwo-axis model, of "personal--impersonal" and "concrete--abstract", can accountfor nearly 80% of the strategy variance between individuals.

The Diversity of Argument-Making in the Wild: from Assumptions and Definitions to Causation and Anecdote in Reddit's "Change My View"