English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

It was recently argued by Catani et al that it is possible to reproduce thephenomenology of the double-slit experiment with a deterministic, local, andclassical model (arXiv:2111.13727). The stated aim of their argument is tofalsify the claim made by Feynman (in his third book of Lectures on Physics)that the double-slit experiment is ``impossible, absolutely impossible, toexplain in any classical way'' and that it ``contains the only mystery'' ofquantum mechanics. We here want to point out some problems with their argument,and defend Feynman's position. This is an update of our criticism following anupdate of Catani et al's paper that clarified some issues we had previouslyraised.

Comment on "Why interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory" by Catani et al