English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Double-blind conferences have engaged in debates over whether to allowauthors to post their papers online on arXiv or elsewhere during the reviewprocess. Independently, some authors of research papers face the dilemma ofwhether to put their papers on arXiv due to its pros and cons. We conduct astudy to substantiate this debate and dilemma via quantitative measurements.Specifically, we conducted surveys of reviewers in two top-tier double-blindcomputer science conferences -- ICML 2021 (5361 submissions and 4699 reviewers)and EC 2021 (498 submissions and 190 reviewers). Our two main findings are asfollows. First, more than a third of the reviewers self-report searching onlinefor a paper they are assigned to review. Second, outside the review process, wefind that preprints from better-ranked affiliations see a weakly highervisibility, with a correlation of 0.06 in ICML and 0.05 in EC. In particular,papers associated with the top-10-ranked affiliations had a visibility ofapproximately 11% in ICML and 22% in EC, whereas the remaining papers had avisibility of 7% and 18% respectively.

To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online