English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This is a response to the note criticizing my paper A New Paradox inSuperluminal Signaling. The criticism is based, among other things, onarbitrarily postulated statement about invarience of direction of superluminalinformation transfer. The analysis presented in my response shows the absenceof any grounds for such statement and confirms my original proof of theimpossibility of one-way superluminal signaling. The analysis also unveils manyother inconsistencies in the discussed note and shows that all its criticism isunsubstantiated.  Key words: superluminal signaling, tachyons, the information flow

The impossibility of one-way superluminal signaling in the framework of modern Physics