English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this paper, we considered the interaction neutrino with three scalarfields(phantom, quintessence, and quintom model) and put constraints on thetotal mass of neutrinos, and comparison the interaction constant $ \beta $ inthese models. The data were used in this paper are supernova type Ia(pantheoncatalog), CMB and BAO data. For each model, we first investigate the resultsobtained from Pantheon data, then survey the CMB and BAO data, and finally, thetotal data from these catalogs. It seems that using a combination of dataproduces more favorable results. For combination data, we find that the totalmass of neutrino $\sum m_{\nu}< 0.121 eV$ $(95\% $ Confidence Level (C.L.) forquintom model and $\sum m_{\nu}< 0.19 eV$ $(95\% $ Confidence Level (C.L.) forphantom model and $\sum m_{\nu}< 0.124 eV$ $(95\% $ Confidence Level (C.L.) forquintessence model. These results are in good agreement with the results ofPlanck 2018 where the limit of the total neutrino mass is $\sum m_{\nu}<0.12eV$ ($95\%$ C.L., TT, TE, EE+lowE+lensing+BAO)

Comparison of the interaction between scalar fields as dark energy with neutrinos and put constraint on neutrino mass in these models