English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The microservice architectural style has gained much attention from bothacademia and industry recently as a novel way to design, develop, and deploycloud-native applications. This concept encourages the decomposition of amonolith into multiple independently deployable units. A typicalmicroservices-based application is formed of two service types: functionalservices, which provide the core business logic, and infrastructure services,which provide essential functionalities for a microservices ecosystem. Toimprove developers' productivity, many software frameworks have been developedto provide those reusable infrastructure services, allowing programmers tofocus on implementing microservices in arbitrary ways. In this work, we madeuse of four open source frameworks to develop a cloud-based application inorder to compare and evaluate their usability and practicability. While allselected frameworks promote asynchronous microservice design in general, thereare differences in the ways each implements services. This leads tointeroperability issues, such as message topic naming convention. Additionally,a key finding is the long startup times of JVM-based services that might reduceapplication's resiliency and portability. Some other advantages come directlyfrom the programming language, such as the ability of Go to generate nativebinary executables, which results in very small and compact Docker images (upto 78\% smaller compared to other languages).

Development Frameworks for Microservice-based Applications: Evaluation and Comparison