English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

While billions of COVID-19 vaccines have been administered, too many peopleremain hesitant. Twitter, with its substantial reach and daily exposure, is anexcellent resource for examining how people frame their vaccine hesitancy andto uncover vaccine hesitancy profiles. In this paper we expose our processingjourney from identifying Vaccine Hesitancy Framings in a collection of9,133,471 original tweets discussing the COVID-19 vaccines, establishing theirontological commitments, annotating the Moral Foundations they imply to theautomatic recognition of the stance of the tweet authors toward any of theCoVaxFrames that we have identified. When we found that 805,336 Twitter usershad a stance towards some CoVaxFrames in either the 9,133,471 original tweetsor their 17,346,664 retweets, we were able to derive nine different VaccineHesitancy Profiles of these users and to interpret these profiles based on theontological commitments of the frames they evoked in their tweets and on valueof their stance towards the evoked frames.

From Hesitancy Framings to Vaccine Hesitancy Profiles: A Journey of Stance, Ontological Commitments and Moral Foundations