English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Researchers are more likely to read and cite papers to which they have accessthan those that they cannot obtain. Thus, the objective of this work is toanalyze the contribution of the Open Access (OA) modality to the impact ofhybrid journals. For this, the research articles in the year 2017 from 200hybrid journals in four subject areas, and the citations received by sucharticles in the period 2017-2020 in the Scopus database, were analyzed. Thejournals were randomly selected from those with share of OA papers higher thansome minimal value. More than 60 thousand research articles were analyzed inthe sample, of which 24% under the OA modality. As results, we obtain thatcites per article in both hybrid modalities strongly correlate. However, thereis no correlation between the OA prevalence and cites per article in any of thehybrid modalities. There is OA citation advantage in 80% of hybrid journals.Moreover, the OA citation advantage is consistent across fields and held intime. We obtain an OA citation advantage of 50% in average, and higher than 37%in half of the hybrid journals. Finally, the OA citation advantage is higher inHumanities than in Science and Social Science.

Contribution of the Open Access modality to the impact of hybrid journals controlling by field and time effects