English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper proposes the development of an index to assess rural developmentbased on a set of 25 demographic, economic, environmental, and social welfareindicators previously selected through a Delphi approach. Three widely acceptedaggregation methods were then tested: a mixed arithmetic/geometric mean withoutweightings for each indicator; a weighted arithmetic mean using the weightspreviously generated by the Delphi panel and an aggregation through PrincipalComponent Analysis. These three methodologies were later applied to 9Portuguese NUTS III regions, and the results were presented to a group ofexperts in rural development who indicated which of the three forms ofaggregation best measured the levels of rural development of the differentterritories. Finally, it was concluded that the unweighted arithmetic/geometricmean was the most accurate methodology for aggregating indicators to create aRural Development Index.

Design and validation of an index to measure development in rural areas through stakeholder participation