English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Stakeholders in research and scientific publishing are gradually joining theOpen-Access (OA) movement, which is gaining momentum to become nowadays at theheart of scientific policies in high-income countries. The rise of OA generatesprofound changes in the chain of production and dissemination of knowledge.Free access to peer-reviewed research methods and results has contributed tothe dynamics of science observed in recent years. The modes of publication andaccess have also evolved; the classic model, based on journal subscriptions isgradually giving way to new economic models that have appeared with the arrivalof OA. The objective of this article is twofold. First, propose a model for thepublishing market based on the literature as well as on changes in open sciencepolicies. Second, analyze publishing strategies of publishers and institutions.To do so, we relied on game theory in economics. Results show that in the shortterm, the publisher's equilibrium strategy is to adopt a hybridpublishingmodel, while the institutions' equilibrium strategy is to publish in OA. Thisequilibrium is not stable and that in the medium/long term, the two playerswill converge on an OA publishing strategy. The analysis of the equilibrium inmixed-strategies confirms this result.

Game theory and scholarly publishing: premises for an agreement around open access