English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Multiple-choice multiple-response (MCMR) items (i.e., multiple-choicequestions for which more than one response may be selected) can be a valuabletool for assessment. Like traditional multiple-choice single-responsequestions, they are easy to score, but MCMR items can provide more informationabout student thinking by probing multiple reasoning facets in a single problemcontext. In this paper, we discuss differences in performance on MCMR itemsthat result from differences in administration method (paper vs. online). Inparticular, we find a tendency for ``clickiness'' in online administration:students choose more responses to MCMR items when taking the electronic versionof the assessment. Based on these findings, we recommend that onlineadministration be compared only to other online administrations and not topaper administrations when comparing student results on MCMR items. Theseresults also suggest that MCMR items provide a unique opportunity to probedifferences in online and on-paper administration of low-stakes assessments.

Online test administration results in students selecting more responses to multiple-choice-multiple-response items