English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In academia, the research performance of a faculty is either evaluated by thenumber of publications or the number of citations. Most of the time h-index iswidely used during the hiring process or the faculty performance evaluation.The calculation of the h-index is shown in various databases; however, there isno systematic evidence about the differences between them. Here we analyze thepublication records of 385 authors from Monash University (Australia) toinvestigate (i) the impact of different databases like Scopus and WoS on theranking of authors within a discipline, and (ii) to complement the $h$-index,named $h_c$, by adding the weight of the highest cited paper to the $h$-indexof the authors. The results show the positive impact of $h_c$ on thelower-ranked authors in every discipline. Also, Scopus provides an overallbetter ranking than WoS; however, the ranking varies among Scopus and WoS fordisciplines.

Impact of $h$-index on authors ranking: An improvement to the h-index for lower-ranked author