English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Skrzypulec (2021) raises the question whether motor activation by maskedcolor primes is based on the same type of color representation as consciousvision. He postulates that the literature on color processing without awarenessmakes an implicit assumption that "conscious" and "unconscious" colorrepresentations have the same properties, in which case priming by masked colorstimuli would indeed indicate that the same complex representation of surfacecolor can be conscious as well as unconscious. I review some evidence fromresponse priming by lightness stimuli in the context of a visual illusion thatalters the perceived lightness of the primes (Schmidt et al., 2010). Thoseresults clearly show that response priming is not driven by color-constantinformation but instead by local image contrast, making it unlikely that rapidresponse activation by color primes is based on a color-constant representationof surface color.

Is response priming based on surface color? Response to Skrzypulec (2021)