English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Kane and Mertz's 2012 AMS Notices article "Debunking Myths about Gender andMathematics Performance" claims to have debunked the greater male variabilityhypothesis with respect to mathematics abilities. The logical and statisticalarguments supporting their claim, however, which are being widely cited in thescientific literature, contain fundamental errors. The methodology iscritically flawed, the main logical premise is false, and the article omitsreference to numerous published scientific research articles that contradictits findings. Most critically, Kane and Mertz's final conclusion that theirdata are inconsistent with the greater male variability hypothesis is wrong.The goal of the present note is to correct the scientific record with respectto those claims. Most importantly, by publicizing these errors, the Noticeswill reduce the chance of similar future errors being repeated.

Fundamental Errors in Kane and Mertz's Alleged Debunking of Greater Male Variability in Mathematics Performance