English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

School performance measures are published annually in England to hold schoolsto account and to support parental school choice. This article reviews andevaluates the Progress 8 secondary school accountability system forstate-funded schools. We assess the statistical strengths and weaknesses ofProgress 8 relating to: choice of pupil outcome attainment measures; potentialadjustments for pupil input attainment and background characteristics;decisions around which schools and pupils are excluded from the measure;presentation of Progress 8 to users, choice of statistical model, andcalculation of statistical uncertainty; and issues related to the volatility ofschool performance over time, including scope for reporting multi-yearaverages. We then discuss challenges for Progress 8 raised by the COVID-19pandemic. Six simple recommendations follow to improve Progress 8 and schoolaccountability in England.

A review and evaluation of secondary school accountability in England: Statistical strengths, weaknesses, and challenges for 'Progress 8'