English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

We propose a method to evaluate and improve the validity of requiredspecifications by comparing models from different viewpoints. Inconsistenciesare automatically extracted from the model in which the analyst defines theservice procedure based on the initial requirement; thereafter, the analystautomatically compares it with a state transition model from the same initialrequirement that has been created by an evaluator who is different from theanalyst. The identified inconsistencies are reported to the analyst to enablethe improvement of the required specifications. We develop a tool forextraction and comparison and then discuss its effectiveness by applying themethod to a requirements specification example.

validation method to improve behavioral flows on uml requirements analysis model by cross-checking with state transition model