English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In our analysis, we show that what Cottenden et al. accomplish is thederivation of the ordinary capstan equation, and a solution to a dynamicmembrane with both a zero-Poisson's ratio and a zero-mass density on a rigidright-circular cone. The authors states that the capstan equation holds truefor an elastic obstacle, and thus, it can be used to calculate the coefficientof friction between human skin and fabrics. However, using data that wegathered from human trials, we show that this claim cannot be substantiated asit is unwise to use the capstan equation (i.e. belt-friction models in general)to calculate the friction between in-vivo skin and fabrics. This is due to thefact that such models assume a rigid foundation, while human soft-tissue isdeformable, and thus, a portion of the applied force to the fabric is expendedon deforming the soft-tissue, which in turn leads to the illusion of a highercoefficient of friction when using belt-friction models.

A Critical Study of Cottenden et al.'s An Analytical Model of the Motion  of a Conformable Sheet Over a General Convex Surface in the Presence of  Frictional Coupling