English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Research ethics in Information and Communications Technology has seen aresurgence in popularity in recent years. Although a number of general ethicsstandards have been issued, cyber security specifically has yet to see one.Furthermore, such standards are often abstract, lacking in guidance on specificpractices. In this paper we compare peer-reviewed ethical analyses of condemnedresearch papers to analyses derived from a knowledge base (KB) of concretecyber security research ethics best practices. The KB we employ was compiled inprior work from a large random survey of research papers. We demonstratepreliminary evidence that such a KB can be used to yield comparable or moreextensive ethical analyses of published cyber security research than expertapplication of standards like the Menlo Report. We extend the ethical analysesof the reviewed manuscripts, and calculate measures of the efficiency withwhich the expert versus KB methods yield ethical insights.

Knowledge-Base Practicality for Cybersecurity Research Ethics Evaluation