English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Driven by the need to coordinate activities of multiple agile developmentteams cooperating to produce a large software product, software-intensiveorganizations are turning to scaling agile software development frameworks.Despite the growing adoption of various scalin g agile frameworks, there islittle empirical evidence of how effective their practices are in mitigatingrisk, especially in global software develop ment (GSD), where project failureis a known problem.  In this study, we develop a GSD Risk Catalog of 63 risks to assess the degreeto which two scaling agile frameworks--Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD) and theScaled Agile Framework (SAFe)--address software project risks in GSD. Weexamined data from two longitudinal case studies implementing each framework toidentify the extent to which the framework practices address GSD risks.  Scaling agile frameworks appear to help companies eliminate or mitigate manytraditional risks in GSD, especially relating to users and customers. How ever,several important risks were not eliminated or mitigated. These persistentrisks in the main belonged to the Environment quadrant highlighting t heinherent risk in developing software across geographic boundaries. Perhapsthese frameworks (and arguably any framework), would have difficulty alleviating, issues that appear to be outside the immediate control of theorganization.

Do Scaling Agile Frameworks Address Global Software Development Risks? An Empirical Study