English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Quantum Mechanics (QM) has faced deep controversies and debates since itsorigin when Werner Heisenberg proposed the first mathematical formalism capableto operationally account for what had been recently discovered as the new fieldof quantum phenomena. Today, even though we have reached a standardized versionof QM which is taught in Universities all around the world, there is still noconsensus regarding the conceptual reference of the theory and, if or if not,it can refer to something beyond measurement outcomes. In this work we willargue that the reason behind the impossibility to reach a meaningful answer tothis question is strictly related to the 20th Century Bohrian-positivistre-foundation of physics which is responsible for having introduced within thetheory of quanta a harmful combination of metaphysical dogmatism and naiveempiricism. We will also argue that the possibility of understanding QM is atplain sight, given we return to the original framework of physics in which themeaning of understanding has always been clear.

Understanding Quantum Mechanics (Beyond Metaphysical Dogmatism and Naive Empiricism)